tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7174859248263331309.post8421895460291916768..comments2022-01-19T04:10:11.905-08:00Comments on WORK COMP CONNECTION: Your Work Comp Case: Tips for Representing YourselfSquaw Lawshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14050110496273501241noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7174859248263331309.post-81499689112788084872013-05-08T13:48:35.877-07:002013-05-08T13:48:35.877-07:00I’ve been exploring for a little for any high-qual...I’ve been exploring for a little for any high-quality articles or blog posts on <br />this sort of area . Exploring in Yahoo I eventually stumbled upon <br />this web site. Studying this information So i’m satisfied to express that <br />I’ve a very good uncanny feeling I discovered just what I needed.<br /><br />I so much indisputably will make certain to don?<br /><br />t overlook this web site and give it a look on a constant basis.<br /><br /><br /><br />Have a look at my site - <a href="http://wiki.insidebci.com/TanyaqvGamboaci" rel="nofollow">Wiki.Insidebci.com</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7174859248263331309.post-17416318296921812832009-08-11T15:48:19.411-07:002009-08-11T15:48:19.411-07:00.AM A PSYCHIATRIST NOT ON WC PANEL. HAVE A CLAIMAN....AM A PSYCHIATRIST NOT ON WC PANEL. HAVE A CLAIMANT WHO HAS RUN THROUGH SEVERAL WC ATTORNIES. IT APPEARS TO ME THAT THE INSURANCE COMPANY MAY BE SUPRESSING HER CASE. THE ORTHOPEDIST INITIALLY ON HER CASE(WORK RELATED SLIP AND FALL SUBSEQUNT INJURIES TO BACK,NECK, KNEE, AND SHOULDER WITH RESULTING CHRONIC PAIN DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY)FOUND INJURIES TO FOUR DISCS ETC. AND RECOMMENDED TREATMENT AND SURGERY IN 2005. HE WAS REMOVED FROM THE CASE SINCE HE WASN'T ON THE PANEL. SHE HAS GOTTEN NO TREATMENT NO SURGERY AND NO DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES SINCE 2006 AND IS WORSE BY THE DAY. THE SURGEON SAYS SHE CANNOT HAVE SURGERY AS PSYCHOLOGICALLY SHE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO DEAL WITH A BAD RESULT. THE PSYCHIATRIST OTHER THAN ME HAS MADE NO COMMENT ON HER CAPABILITY OR COMPETENCE IN THAT REGARD BUT SAYS HER CONDITION IS PRE-EXISTENT AND SIGNIFICANT BUT DUE TO PRE-EXISTING FACTORS THOUGH SHE NEVER SAW ANYONE FOR PSYCHIATRIC REASONS AND HAS NO HISTORY OF SUCH WHATSOEVER. THE NEUROLOGIST WON'T ORDER TESTS FOR HER NECK, RADICULAR PAIN, BACK, KNEE OR SHOULDER, BUT WANTS AND MRI OF THE HEAD DUE TO HER POOR MEMORY WITHOUT ANY FOCAL NEUROLOGICAL SIGNS. SHE STUMBLES AND FALLS HER QUALITY OF LIFE IS POOR AND SHE WAS FORMALLY THE SUPPORT OF HER WHOLE FAMILY. THE LAWYER WON'T GET HER TREATMENT WON'T GET HER INITIAL ORTHOPRDIST REPORT RATED AND HE RECENTLY STATED AFTER SEEING HER HE STANDS BY HIS FIRST IMPRESSION AND THAT SHE IS WORSE OFF. HE HAS NOT ASKED ME TO DO ANYTHING. THE INSURANCE COMPANY AT A DEPO THREATENED HER WITH JAILING DUE TO PERJURY WHEN SHE COULD'T REMEMBER DATES AND FACTS. I EXAMINED THE FILE AND FOUND THEY WERE QUESTIONING HER ABOUT ANOTHER WOMAN'S RECORDS THEY HAD PLACED IN THE FILE AND THINGS SHE HAD DONE 10-15 YEARS AGO. THEY ARE NOE ATTEMPTING TO FORCE HER TOTAKE $15,000 WITHOUT FUTURE MEDICAL OR EVEN DIAGNOSTICS OF HER CURRENT STATUS. WHAT CAN BE DONE? AND HOW COMMON ARE THESE PRACTICES OR STORIES.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com